Divorce and family law matters such as custody disputes can prove immensely complex and emotionally challenging. At Minyard Morris, our dedicated team of Anaheim Hills divorce attorneys stands ready to provide the supportive counsel you need in these pivotal moments.
As a trusted presence in Orange County, we bring our collective decades of experience to the table. Our team of 19 lawyers strives to exceed our clients’ expectations with thoughtful and effective solutions tailored to each unique situation. In 2024, the preeminent independent lawyer rating service BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA actually listed 19 of 20 Minyard Morris attorneys.
For decades, the lawyers at Minyard Morris have come together regularly to strategize and discuss their clients’ cases. Three times each week—on Monday evenings at 5:00 pm, and at noon on both Tuesday and Thursday—the firm’s attorneys gather for these essential conferences. With over 350 years of combined experience, these meetings are not just routine; they are a cornerstone of the firm’s practice, providing a platform to analyze case complexities, share insights, and develop strategies.
During these sessions, the attorneys address a wide range of topics, such as how best to handle specific opposing counsel, approach unique issues with the assigned judicial officer, and consider the latest relevant case law and statutes. Discussions also cover new appellate court cases, recent seminars on family law topics, past cases the firm has managed, settlement options, evidentiary issues, trial strategies, and assessing the value of the issues at stake. The meetings provide an opportunity to evaluate the probability of success and align on the client’s objectives and goals, among countless other issues.
It is well known in the family law community that Minyard Morris conducts these collaborative meetings. Lawyers and judicial officers frequently express curiosity about this unique practice. This consistent collaboration and team approach attract talented attorneys to the firm. By leveraging the expertise of 19 family law specialists, Minyard Morris maximizes its ability to serve clients effectively.
The value of these collaborative conferences for clients varies depending on the specifics of each case. While it may be challenging to quantify their impact precisely, one can ask: Would you prefer to have a lawyer who has the collective insight of 20 other seasoned family law attorneys specializing exclusively in Orange County family law, or rely solely on the limited resources of a smaller firm?
A common scenario discussed during these meetings might involve exploring whether there is legal support for a specific position, either on behalf of our client or the opposing side. Often, one of the firm’s 19 attorneys will have already dealt with a similar issue and can recall the relevant appellate court cases and their outcomes. This shared knowledge eliminates the need for extensive research, saving time and resources.
Other times, a lawyer may seek a “reality check” on the case’s key issues, benefiting from the collective input of the team. The group often discusses the likelihood of success on a specific issue in front of the particular judicial officer assigned to the case. Additionally, these meetings frequently involve debates on which expert should be retained for a case. Perhaps the most crucial aspect of these conferences is the collaborative effort to structure settlements creatively and brainstorm ways to overcome potential roadblocks. The scenarios explored in these meetings are endless, covering virtually every facet of family law practice.
Minyard Morris dedicates the time of 20 lawyers to these meetings, three times a week, without ever billing a client for this service. While the internal cost to the firm is significant—easily calculated considering hourly rates between $350 and $800—the commitment to these meetings reflects the value the firm sees in providing this benefit to clients.
Certainly, other law firms informally consult among their attorneys on cases. However, no firm conducts such frequent and intensive meetings as Minyard Morris. These sessions are a key factor that sets the firm apart in the family law field. Clients recognize the added value this unique approach provides, contributing to the firm’s reputation for delivering the highest level of client service and achieving optimal results.
In essence, these meetings play an indispensable role in the representation and success of our clients. By continuing this longstanding tradition, Minyard Morris remains committed to offering unparalleled legal support in family law cases.
California Family Code, as it applies to divorce, is exceedingly complicated. As your counsel, we illuminate the law for you so that you can make the informed decisions that are best for your family. To provide more information as you begin the process of dissolving your marriage, we have answered a few of our clients’ most frequently asked questions.
When meeting with a divorce attorney for the first time, particularly when considering them for representation, it is crucial to discuss the core issues of your case thoroughly. Pose specific questions about the aspects you find most critical. Ask about the probable outcomes related to child custody, the valuation of any jointly-owned business, the expected amounts for child and spousal support, strategies for the distribution of assets, and any other topics important to you.
Pay close attention to how the lawyer responds to your queries. Assess whether their answers are detailed, useful, and clear, or if they come across as evasive or ambiguous. Consider whether their responses instill confidence in their abilities, or if they leave you with doubts about proceeding with their services. It’s important to discern whether you feel the lawyer is merely telling you what you want to hear or if they are providing a candid and accurate evaluation of your situation.
The initial consultation is often the most critical interaction you will have with your attorney. To prepare effectively, conduct focused research on the internet prior to your meeting to better understand the fundamental issues at hand. This preparation will enable you to ask more informed questions.
For the consultation, come prepared with:
This level of preparedness will help ensure that your time with the attorney is both productive and cost-efficient, setting the stage for a more informed and effective legal partnership.
In Orange County, divorce courts divide community property equally between spouses. This means that any assets acquired during the marriage are presumed to be jointly owned. They are subject to 50-50 division unless the spouses reach an agreement is reached that dictates otherwise.
Shared debts in California receive similar treatment to shared assets. Both parties may assume 50-50 responsibility for debts incurred during the marriage unless the parties to the divorce decide otherwise.
Handling multiple real estate properties requires careful consideration of their value and whether they are separate or marital property. If the title is in only one party’s name, it will likely that it will be characterized as that party’s separate property. However, community income was used to pay the payments on the property or improve it, the community may have an interest in the property. Spouses may decide to sell the home and split the profit, buy out the other spouse’s share or offset other assets of equal value. Our Anaheim Hills divorce lawyers work with you to evaluate these factors and reach a fair distribution that aligns with California law.
Even if you and your spouse agree on the terms of your divorce, it is wise to consult with a family law lawyer. Your divorce attorney will explain your options and give you a cost-benefit analysis, protect your rights, draft legally sound agreements and move smoothly toward a final decree.
In the landscape of divorce and family law, the right guidance can make a significant difference. Our Anaheim Hills divorce attorneys pride themselves on being intelligent, creative and hardworking, providing you with the support you need to navigate family law matters effectively.
Divorce is rarely a straightforward process, and the complexities of property division can add further stress and confusion. In California, one of the most pivotal aspects of divorce is distinguishing between separate and community property. The classification of assets significantly influences how they are divided, impacting each party’s financial future. This guide delves deeply into the intricacies of separate property, how it intersects with community property, and the legal principles governing asset division in a California divorce.
Under California law, separate property pertains to assets that are solely owned by one spouse. Separate property typically falls into one of the following categories:
The central determinant for classifying an asset as separate property is the date of acquisition. This classification is vital because any asset acquired outside these categories is likely to be classified as community property, which is subject to division.
Community property encompasses all assets and income accumulated by either spouse during the marriage, regardless of whose name is on the title. While California law mandates an equal division of community property, this division does not necessitate a literal fifty-fifty split of every individual asset. Instead, the court is tasked with ensuring an equitable distribution of the total value of the assets. This often results in the allocation of specific assets to each spouse, with the possibility of one spouse making an equalization payment to ensure parity in the division.
A notable exception to the community property rule is property received as a gift or inheritance. Under California law, these assets are unequivocally regarded as separate property, irrespective of when they are received during the marriage. However, it is essential for the spouse receiving the gift or inheritance to maintain these assets separately.
Commingling inherited funds or gifted assets with community property—such as depositing inherited money into a joint bank account—can blur the lines of ownership, potentially subjecting these assets to division as community property. To preserve their separate property status, these assets should be kept distinct and identifiable from community resources.
The issue of business ownership in divorce can be particularly intricate, especially when a business was owned prior to marriage. In such cases, the business itself is considered separate property. However, if the business appreciates in value during the marriage—whether due to market conditions or the efforts of the owner-spouse—the community may have a right to a portion of that appreciation.
California courts apply one of two primary methods to assess the community’s interest in the increased value of the business:
In exceptional circumstances, the court may elect to apply both formulas if there is a significant change in the business’s nature during the course of the marriage. However, it is important to note that neither the community nor the non-owner spouse can obtain an ownership interest in the business itself—their claim is limited to financial reimbursement for the business’s growth during the marriage.
When a business is formed or purchased during the marriage, it is typically regarded as community property. In most divorce cases, the court will award the business to the spouse who is actively involved in its operation. However, determining the value of the business is often a complex process, necessitating the involvement of forensic accountants or other financial experts.
The valuation of a business typically relies on two accepted methodologies:
These methods aim to calculate the investment value of the business, reflecting its worth as an ongoing enterprise to the spouse who will retain it. The valuation does not necessarily reflect the price the business would fetch in a hypothetical sale. If the court determines that an equalization payment is necessary to ensure a fair division of assets, this payment is calculated on an after-tax basis and is not tax-deductible for the paying spouse.
When one spouse owns a residence prior to marriage, the home remains their separate property. However, if community funds are used during the marriage to pay down the mortgage or improve the property, the community may acquire a proportional interest in the home’s increased value. This scenario gives rise to what is known as the Moore Marsden formula, a legal doctrine that calculates the community’s interest in the property by considering both the amount of mortgage principal paid with community funds and the appreciation of the property during the marriage.
If the owning spouse wishes to convert the separate property home into community property, they may do so through a transmutation, which requires a clear and explicit written agreement. Courts are stringent in enforcing the requirements for transmutation, and oral promises or informal declarations are insufficient to change the ownership of property.
The date of separation is a pivotal issue in California divorces, as it marks the point at which community property stops accumulating, and any assets acquired thereafter are considered separate property. The date of separation occurs when one spouse clearly and unequivocally communicates their intent to end the marriage, either through words or actions.
While physical separation, such as living apart, may indicate the end of the marriage, it is not, in itself, sufficient to establish the date of separation unless accompanied by a clear expression of intent to dissolve the marital relationship. Moreover, the court will consider whether the spouses resumed marital activities, such as cohabitation or maintaining a joint financial life, when determining whether the separation was genuine and final.
Documenting the date of separation in writing—via email, text message, or formal communication—can prevent future disputes, which may otherwise lead to costly litigation. The date of separation can have far-reaching implications, affecting the division of assets, the duration of spousal support, and the responsibility for debts.
After the date of separation, each spouse’s earnings become their separate property. However, a common issue arises when one spouse uses post-separation income to pay community debts or maintain community property. In such cases, the paying spouse may be entitled to reimbursement, unless the expenses were incurred for their own benefit—such as paying for a vehicle they continue to use after the separation—or in lieu of spousal support.
To avoid confusion and prevent disputes over post-separation expenditures, it is advisable for couples to immediately separate their finances. This includes closing joint bank accounts, ceasing the use of shared credit cards, and establishing clear boundaries regarding financial responsibilities.
To protect your financial interests and navigate the complexities of divorce, it is essential to take the following practical steps once you and your spouse decide to separate:
Physical Custody
Physical custody establishes where a child will live and defines the specific time-sharing arrangement between the parents. When both parents spend a nearly equal amount of time with the child typically a 50/50 arrangement—this is known as joint physical custody. If the time allocated to one parent is considerably less, it may be referred to as “visitation” or scheduled custodial time, where the child spends only designated periods with that parent rather than maintaining a shared living arrangement.
Legal Custody
Legal custody gives a parent or both parents the right to make major decisions affecting the child’s health, education, and overall well-being. It is generally granted jointly to allow both parents an equal say in the child’s life. However, in situations where the parents have significant difficulty cooperating, the court may award sole legal custody to one parent. This grants only one parent the authority to make critical choices, such as which school the child will attend or which medical treatments they receive, if it’s determined that joint decision-making isn’t feasible.
Non-Modifiable Custody Orders
Parents sometimes ask if they can set up a child custody agreement that is unchangeable. However, courts retain the right to modify any child custody arrangement, as the child’s best interest remains paramount. While parents can draft an agreement that appears “permanent” or fixed, a judge is unlikely to approve it as non-modifiable. Even if such an agreement were signed, either parent could request a change if circumstances warranted it. The same rule applies to child support arrangements, as both child custody and child support are considered modifiable when it comes to the well-being of the child.
The Value of Cooperation in Custody Cases
Family courts consider each parent’s willingness to cooperate with the other in fostering a positive co-parenting relationship. Courts often look favorably on the parent who consistently facilitates the child’s relationship with the other parent and maintains a mature, cooperative attitude. When one parent goes out of their way to create a harmonious environment and is accommodating, it can significantly benefit their case, while actions that impede co-parenting, such as refusing to communicate or being vindictive, can reflect poorly.
Modifying Custody Orders
Requesting a modification to an existing custody order is generally a challenging process. Courts discourage parents from seeking changes unless there has been a meaningful shift in circumstances. In family law, this “change of circumstances” standard is meant to prevent frequent court visits and ensure stability for the child. It’s wise to consult an experienced child custody lawyer to understand if your situation qualifies for modification, as courts can dismiss cases that don’t meet the necessary threshold. Filing without sufficient cause can be costly, and the court may order the parent seeking change to pay the other’s legal fees if the request is deemed unwarranted.
Re-filing Custody Requests
Parents can re-file a request to modify custody, but doing so without new evidence or significant changes can harm their case. Courts will look for a substantial shift in circumstances since the previous hearing. If you re-file with the same evidence, the court may view this as an attempt to re-litigate the same facts, which could result in the other parent’s legal fees being covered at your expense. It’s essential to present clear, substantial evidence of changed circumstances if you intend to request a modification.
Adjusting Parenting Time vs. Custody Changes
There is a subtle difference between altering parenting time and modifying the core custody arrangement. The court can make adjustments to a parenting schedule, like moving from an equal split to an alternating schedule, without requiring a significant change in circumstances. This flexibility allows the court to tailor the schedule to the child’s best interests, even if the overall custody arrangement stays the same. However, the court still examines whether the change serves the child’s welfare.
Supervised Visitation and Custody Monitoring
In cases where the court believes there may be a risk to the child, it can order supervised visitation to ensure the child’s safety. A monitor, who may be a relative, friend, or professional, observes these visits, typically as a temporary solution. Professional monitors often undergo specific training and background checks to qualify, and they may charge fees that the court decides which parent will cover. This supervised visitation arrangement allows the court to balance the child’s safety with the parent’s right to maintain a relationship.
Equal Custody Orders and Court Preferences
Many courts begin by considering a 50/50 custody arrangement, as studies indicate that children benefit from substantial and consistent time with both parents. However, an equal division of time is not automatically granted. The court will deviate from a 50/50 arrangement if it believes a different setup better serves the child’s needs. Common reasons for not granting equal time include safety concerns or poor judgment in parenting. The court’s focus always remains on what’s best for the child’s emotional and physical development.
Parental Conduct in Custody Cases
While no parent is expected to be perfect, parents involved in custody disputes are encouraged to conduct themselves with maturity and focus on the child’s best interests. Poor decisions can negatively affect one’s case, as the court evaluates each parent’s overall behavior and parenting style. Being mindful of choices, especially around children, and demonstrating responsible, child-centered behavior can positively influence the court’s decision.
Social Media and Custody Concerns
Social media activity can inadvertently harm a custody case if posts are misinterpreted as showing poor judgment. A lighthearted or casual post may appear inappropriate in the context of custody proceedings, potentially affecting the court’s perception. Deleting posts may look suspicious or like evidence tampering, so it’s advisable to simply limit new posts during the case.
Relocation Requests and Custody Implications
While everyone has the right to move, relocating with a child often requires court approval, as it impacts the other parent’s rights and the child’s routine. Moving without securing the court’s consent can create significant legal challenges, as courts heavily scrutinize relocation cases. The success of a relocation request often depends on the existing custody arrangement and the circumstances motivating the move. Winning relocation at the trial level is essential, as appellate courts rarely overturn custody decisions.
Impact of Negative Talk on Custody
Speaking poorly about the other parent in the child’s presence is strongly discouraged, as courts prioritize protecting the child’s emotional health. Allowing a child to overhear negative remarks, whether by a parent or a third party, can result in court orders prohibiting this behavior. Courts recognize that these actions can damage a child’s self-esteem and sense of security, and parents engaging in this behavior may face repercussions in their custody case.
Parental Coaching in Custody Cases
When parents try to influence their child’s responses for court proceedings, this is known as coaching. Courts use various methods to gather accurate information from the child’s perspective, often appointing child advocates or mental health professionals. Detecting coaching can significantly harm a parent’s credibility in court, as the judge prioritizes the child’s well-being and looks unfavorably on attempts to manipulate a child’s statements.
Custodial Interference and Consequences
Courts view a parent’s willingness to respect the other parent’s custody time as a key factor in determining custody. Attempts to limit or deny time with the other parent without good reason can negatively affect the withholding parent’s case. Courts look for a spirit of cooperation and shared parenting, and any interference can damage a parent’s position in a custody dispute.
Retaliation in Custody Cases
Although it’s common to feel resentment during divorce proceedings, courts expect parents to separate these feelings from their parenting responsibilities. Retaliatory actions often backfire, as courts seek evidence that each parent is mature, focused on the child’s well-being, and capable of co-parenting in the child’s best interest. Actions motivated by retaliation are viewed as harmful and may work against the retaliating parent.
Compliance with Custody Orders
Custody orders are mandatory, and non-compliance is often seen as disregard for the court’s authority. Adhering closely to a custody order is essential, as failing to do so may result in a less favorable outcome in future custody arrangements. Courts view each parent’s willingness to follow orders as a sign of respect and cooperation, which can influence any subsequent decisions.
Using Children as Messengers
Using children to pass messages to the other parent is discouraged, as it places undue emotional stress on them. Courts typically advise against involving children in parental communications, and many direct parents to avoid discussing any divorce-related issues with the children. Alternative communication methods, such as texting or email, are preferable to involving children in these discussions.
Custody Appeals and Challenges
Appealing a custody decision is possible but rarely successful. Appeals must be based on legal errors or an obvious abuse of discretion, as courts have significant leeway in deciding custody matters. Since most custody rulings involve the judge’s.
At Minyard Morris, we are ready to help you with your family law and divorce needs. We encourage you to reach out to us at 949-724-1111 or use our online contact form to discuss how we can assist you in this critical time.